Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 18:29:29 GMT -5
Answer 1 is our current roster format.
Answer 2 is it can be any outfield position for all three slots, so you can start two great CF's for instance.
Please vote!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 18:31:30 GMT -5
I like the LF, CF, RF it makes it more realistic
Also it took me forever to get a CF despite having 3 OF so I'm not letting that go to waste
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 20:51:37 GMT -5
I really enjoy the LF, RF, CF option
Makes a team owner work harder to fill those positions.
Also, makes players with versatility more valuable.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 20:55:46 GMT -5
I really enjoy the LF, RF, CF option Makes a team owner work harder to fill those positions. Also, makes players with versatility more valuable. If I could like this post I would |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 22:45:37 GMT -5
I really enjoy the LF, RF, CF option Makes a team owner work harder to fill those positions. Also, makes players with versatility more valuable. If I could like this post I would Thanks...that would definitely be a first |
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Kevin) on Oct 11, 2011 22:57:02 GMT -5
We better keep the LF RF CF. If not I am going to be pissed because I had to trade Ellsbury or Granderson and I moved Granderson. Both of them in my lineup would have been nasty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigers GM (Alex) on Oct 12, 2011 13:11:12 GMT -5
The whole point of a dynasty salary league is to be realistic. Why wouldn't we just stay with RF, CF, LF then?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2011 2:17:22 GMT -5
Currently I have no OF's of consequence so lol I am going towards being more realistic here.
|
|
2019 On Deck Circle Champions!