Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2019 22:06:34 GMT -5
I select Foghorn Leghorn #1 You sure you dont want Pepe Le Pew for how much casino corp stinks? My bad thought we were having a Rooster draft. I beat the best team in your division you're welcome. |
|
|
|
Post by Astros GM (Max) on Apr 22, 2019 22:49:48 GMT -5
That's a setting you can choose - not sure it's an absolute Also, how will we deal with openers? That counts as a start, but it really shouldn't. In essence, openers become useless and again people have made moves to acquire these players and then will be told they are useless If we do a start limit they become more useful since they don't use a start up. Or we do innings limit. Edit - well idk whether you mean the opener or the longman guy I meant the pure openers. Like Ryne Stanek, Hunter Wood, etc. Those guys become pretty much worthless and that doesn't seem right to me. What is wrong with the current system? If people are too stupid to not know you need to make moves on Day X and then not make any more moves unless someone is hurt or you make a trade, that's their fault. |
|
|
|
Post by White Sox GM (Michael) on Apr 23, 2019 12:58:07 GMT -5
If we do a start limit they become more useful since they don't use a start up. Or we do innings limit. Edit - well idk whether you mean the opener or the longman guy I meant the pure openers. Like Ryne Stanek, Hunter Wood, etc. Those guys become pretty much worthless and that doesn't seem right to me. What is wrong with the current system? If people are too stupid to not know you need to make moves on Day X and then not make any more moves unless someone is hurt or you make a trade, that's their fault. I believe you were penalized under the same system last year and a lot of people still have trouble. It's burdensome and in my opinion, that constant finger-pointing/asking LMs whether something was illegal is worse than seeing Ryne Stanek lose a little value. Besides, an innings limit instead of a start limit wouldn't hurt them if you wanted that. |
|
|
|
Post by White Sox GM (Michael) on Apr 23, 2019 12:59:20 GMT -5
Why don't we just go with 13 Bats and 13 Pitchers, Can't do more on either side, then you can't stack one side. You could still swap out SPs unless you kept the current Monday lock system |
|
|
|
Post by Astros GM (Max) on Apr 23, 2019 22:59:29 GMT -5
I meant the pure openers. Like Ryne Stanek, Hunter Wood, etc. Those guys become pretty much worthless and that doesn't seem right to me. What is wrong with the current system? If people are too stupid to not know you need to make moves on Day X and then not make any more moves unless someone is hurt or you make a trade, that's their fault. I believe you were penalized under the same system last year and a lot of people still have trouble. It's burdensome and in my opinion, that constant finger-pointing/asking LMs whether something was illegal is worse than seeing Ryne Stanek lose a little value. Besides, an innings limit instead of a start limit wouldn't hurt them if you wanted that. It was confusing last year because it was new. I don't think we've had any issues this year (lost cats by ARZ and BAL were because they didn't drop players from the offseason). It seems to be working very well and making sense to people now that we have had it in place for a full season. Changing it again for the sake of changing it just seems cumbersome and confusing. |
|
|
|
Post by Mariners GM (David) on Apr 26, 2019 15:11:16 GMT -5
Side Suggestion:
Having to keep track of players who are on your IL anytime you add/remove someone from it. Kinda like FA bidding, you should list your current IL players when adding or removing someone.
IE:
Send to IL:
Clint Frazier OF
Current IL:
Freddy Peralta SP
Greg Bird 1B
Joey Wendle
I think it would help keep track of your IL players.
|
|
