|
|
Post by dodgersgm on Oct 11, 2011 16:56:08 GMT -5
Dodgers receive:
$15 million paid of Lee in 2012
Michael Pineda: $.3m (1)
Colby Rasmus: $1m (3)
White Sox receive:
Clayton Kershaw $3.6M (4)
Dodgers accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Sox GM (Michael) on Oct 11, 2011 16:59:09 GMT -5
You mean accept haha...I like Pineda a lot but Kershaw is more sure-fire. Rasmus also proves to be volatile. The money means a lot more to Alex than it does to me.
Accept
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 17:00:20 GMT -5
Approve reluctantly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 17:05:37 GMT -5
Pass, I mean he reduces Lee's contract who can pitch like Kershaw making Lee more valuable, Pineda who has an awesome fastball and could be a 16 game winner for the Mariners, and Rasmus a guy who just a season ago hit like 25 HRs. Kershaw is good and this move will probably send the Dodgers down the rebuilding path, but they do get some potentially loaded top new players/prospects and desperately needed money to cheapen Lee.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 17:31:22 GMT -5
ok. If Rasmus can regain the success he had early in his St. Louis days, and Pineda can continue to his success in Seattle, then the Dodgers will win this deal in the long run.
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Rays GM (forbz) on Oct 11, 2011 17:39:15 GMT -5
approve but white sox win big
|
|
|
|
Post by Diamondbacks GM (Jason) on Oct 11, 2011 19:13:14 GMT -5
Approve. This is a great trade. Kershaw could be the best nl pitcher(and I'm a phillies fan).
Again I think we need to remember vetoing is for completely lopsided trades. I dont know why it bothers me, but trades dont have to be 50/50 or even 49/51. There will be teams that need to take risks and you have to trust people to run their team to some extent.
In this trade We have one team veto and say white sox loses. Then another team says white sox wins big. So all I'm saying is there needs to be some leeway in trades.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2011 19:14:26 GMT -5
Approve. This is a great trade. Kershaw could be the best nl pitcher(and I'm a phillies fan). Again I think we need to remember vetoing is for completely lopsided trades. I dont know why it bothers me, but trades dont have to be 50/50 or even 49/51. There will be teams that need to take risks and you have to trust people to run their team to some extent. In this trade We have one team veto and say white sox loses. Then another team says white sox wins big. So all I'm saying is there needs to be some leeway in trades. Agree 100% |
|
