Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2012 19:20:15 GMT -5
Phillies get:
1B Ryan Howard $20 mil 2016 (2017 option)
Yankees get:
1B Brad Hawpe $0 mil 2014 (mets pay all $3 mil this season, Hawpe is $3 mil in 2013 and 2014)
Kyle Kendrick $1.5 mil (6)
Pick 55 in 2012 draft
Phillies 2013 5th round pick
Accept. Being a Phillies fan I like Howard and I love the value I get him at with him being out for a while. Hopefully he can come back strong and this will pay off.
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Wood) on Jan 7, 2012 19:31:22 GMT -5
accept...losing a great first basemen but need the salary cap and he was just to high...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2012 19:51:30 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryan (ex WAS) on Jan 7, 2012 20:09:53 GMT -5
approve
|
|
|
|
Post by texasrangers on Jan 7, 2012 20:50:21 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by gardyfan on Jan 7, 2012 21:36:29 GMT -5
approve
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2012 23:06:27 GMT -5
Veto. Plenty of teams have $20M available and can offer more than a bench 1B, a #5, and two decent picks
|
|
|
|
Post by tabe on Jan 7, 2012 23:50:54 GMT -5
Who are the nice players in this deal? Im with Mets except a 5th round pick is about the least decent you can get. Veto
|
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Kevin) on Jan 8, 2012 0:42:18 GMT -5
Veto. I dont veto often but lets get real. Kendrick is a long inning reliever who honestly isnt very good. Hawpe is looking to get a sprng training invite. THATS NOT EVEN A CONTRACT. He may not even get on a major league roster. The two picks arent even that great. I would give more for Howard that this.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Sox GM (Michael) on Jan 8, 2012 1:15:03 GMT -5
Due to many complaints about this deal, I'm gonna override the approval here.
I'll come out and say it: I am not a Howard fan. I despise him. However, he can still provide greatly in the HR, RBI and SLG cats.
Both Kendrick and Hawpe are borderline MLB players. The picks don't do much here.
I really don't want to resort to a trade committee but I think that voters need to be less quick to approve on terribly lopsided deals. Maybe have more votes per trade.
|
|
