|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Kevin) on Jan 23, 2012 21:16:50 GMT -5
Lets hear them or we can keep it the same.
Some ideas:
You claim them, you get them.
The current one of claiming and picks numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by bravesgm on Jan 23, 2012 21:19:32 GMT -5
The team that has the worst record, out of all the claims submitted. Then, they are put down to the bottom of the waiver order.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Kevin) on Jan 23, 2012 21:21:28 GMT -5
^no. If I claim a guy who nobody owns the last place person shouldnt automatically get them. The title of the thing was misleading. I renamed it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Diamondbacks GM (Jason) on Jan 23, 2012 22:09:30 GMT -5
I think the person that claimed someone should have a huge advantage to the player that they claim. I mean I am close to the idea that the person that claimed them should just get them. No reason to let the last place team get a player just for being in last. If the last place team is the finder, that's a different story.
I think that we should do something where the claimer gets 50% of the chances to win.
then we can come up with a system. lets say for our example team royals claim/find. then 5 other teams put in a claim.
put the 5 other teams in order of record
worst team then getting
5 chances, then 4, then 3, then 2, then 1. so the other 5 claiming teams get 15 chances when you add them up.
then the claimer would get 15 chances and have a random number generator from 1-30 to find the winner.
1-15 claimer wins
16-20 worst team
21-24 2ND WORST
25 - 27 3rd worst
28-29 4th worst
30 5th worst
this is just an idea that can be changed, but just a quick frame work
|
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Kevin) on Jan 23, 2012 22:21:08 GMT -5
Thats a good idea. I also agree the person who finds the guy should have a greater advantage somehow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigers GM (Alex) on Jan 23, 2012 22:27:34 GMT -5
I'm fine with the claimer having an advantage, but for them to have a 50% advantage is a bit overkill. Maybe like 30% for the claimer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2012 22:38:44 GMT -5
I like Royals idea
|
|
|
|
Post by Marlins GM (Kevin) on Jan 23, 2012 22:51:50 GMT -5
I think 50 is a good amount
|
|
|
|
Post by Diamondbacks GM (Jason) on Jan 24, 2012 14:06:05 GMT -5
I also think some type of draft is good to. There are few people not on any teams.
I think that putting players on their parent team is a bad idea. 1) there's too many players. 2) no one reason to award people that don't research.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Sox GM (Michael) on Jan 24, 2012 18:01:52 GMT -5
I also think some type of draft is good to. There are few people not on any teams. I think that putting players on their parent team is a bad idea. 1) there's too many players. 2) no one reason to award people that don't research. That's what the Rule V is gonna be. I don't know how that'll go down yet though. |
|
2019 On Deck Circle Champions!
